<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black Crowes: Warpaint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2008/02/25/black-crowes-warpaint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2008/02/25/black-crowes-warpaint/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stilldefiant</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2008/02/25/black-crowes-warpaint/comment-page-1/#comment-9328</link>
		<dc:creator>stilldefiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2008/02/25/black-crowes-warpaint/#comment-9328</guid>
		<description>Maxim was flat out wrong for this. As a publication, you would think they would have some kind of standards to not allow someone to print a review of an album that hasn&#039;t been heard. Just plain stupid..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxim was flat out wrong for this. As a publication, you would think they would have some kind of standards to not allow someone to print a review of an album that hasn&#8217;t been heard. Just plain stupid..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cletus McNirtny</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2008/02/25/black-crowes-warpaint/comment-page-1/#comment-9327</link>
		<dc:creator>Cletus McNirtny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2008/02/25/black-crowes-warpaint/#comment-9327</guid>
		<description>I wonder if it even matters since I doubt the Maxim audience and the Crowes&#039; audience have a lot in common.  The only people I see reading Maxim are douchey club guys and the creepy old dude down the hall in our office.  It looks like their already backpedaling some - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maxim.com/MessagetoourReaders/articles/19195.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.maxim.com/MessagetoourReaders/articles/19195.aspx&lt;/a&gt;

It is certainly impressive if you can honestly write an album off as sucking without hearing it first.  I admit I&#039;m a Crowes fan, so I&#039;ll at least give it a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it even matters since I doubt the Maxim audience and the Crowes&#8217; audience have a lot in common.  The only people I see reading Maxim are douchey club guys and the creepy old dude down the hall in our office.  It looks like their already backpedaling some &#8211; <a href="http://www.maxim.com/MessagetoourReaders/articles/19195.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.maxim.com/MessagetoourReaders/articles/19195.aspx</a></p>
<p>It is certainly impressive if you can honestly write an album off as sucking without hearing it first.  I admit I&#8217;m a Crowes fan, so I&#8217;ll at least give it a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2008/02/25/black-crowes-warpaint/comment-page-1/#comment-9326</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2008/02/25/black-crowes-warpaint/#comment-9326</guid>
		<description>i can review it w/o hearing it too....i can even do it in one word.  &#039;sucks.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can review it w/o hearing it too&#8230;.i can even do it in one word.  &#8216;sucks.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

