<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Have Arrived.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4118</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4118</guid>
		<description>Firefox and Adblock FTW!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox and Adblock FTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4117</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 04:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4117</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s the making metblogs NSFW that is a problem, really. Personally, I think that SG is suspect and probably disingenuous about the whole enterprise, but I have no actual objection to porn. My employer does, though. That, and it&#039;s not like SG has any trouble getting adspace, and I see enough naked/seminaked women in most advirtising anyway, which basically means the SG ad just induces eye-rolling on my part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s the making metblogs NSFW that is a problem, really. Personally, I think that SG is suspect and probably disingenuous about the whole enterprise, but I have no actual objection to porn. My employer does, though. That, and it&#8217;s not like SG has any trouble getting adspace, and I see enough naked/seminaked women in most advirtising anyway, which basically means the SG ad just induces eye-rolling on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent (Atl Metblogs)</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent (Atl Metblogs)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4116</guid>
		<description>I always read through a feedreader, so I had no idea.

Personally, I hate the Suicide Girls ad.

My feelings have nothing to do with p0rn or how porn models are treated.  

I don&#039;t like the fact that the ad makes atlanta.metblogs.com a site that I would feel uncomforatble to navigate to at work.

My vote is to remove them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always read through a feedreader, so I had no idea.</p>
<p>Personally, I hate the Suicide Girls ad.</p>
<p>My feelings have nothing to do with p0rn or how porn models are treated.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the fact that the ad makes atlanta.metblogs.com a site that I would feel uncomforatble to navigate to at work.</p>
<p>My vote is to remove them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4115</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4115</guid>
		<description>Haha!  We&#039;re frigid.  Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha!  We&#8217;re frigid.  Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maigh</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4114</link>
		<dc:creator>Maigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4114</guid>
		<description>Good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plumdrank</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4113</link>
		<dc:creator>plumdrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4113</guid>
		<description>the &quot;IDEA&quot; is idiotic

learn to read</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the &#8220;IDEA&#8221; is idiotic</p>
<p>learn to read</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maigh</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4112</link>
		<dc:creator>Maigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4112</guid>
		<description>Calling someone you&#039;ve never met &quot;idiotic&quot; demonstrates a lack of insight and intellect as well as a mean streak the universe doesn&#039;t need. Karma.

That said, here&#039;s an excerpt from the email:

~ so maigh, I noticed the suicide girls link on the atmetblog site, and was like &quot;oh, what is this?&quot;  not even thinking what it could be.  So I clicked on it, and got a nice pay site for meeting women that &quot;dont have big hair or boob jobs&quot;.  Now I&#039;m not saying I&#039;m a prude at all. I love looking at good looking women, ie:
my wife.  youre picture on your site. but I was kind of caught off guard by this link on the site?  They just kind of letting anyone put up advertisement?  like I said, doesn&#039;t bother me, just curious, because it seems alot of times with the postings that people are a little more &quot;frigid&quot; on metblogs.  ~

My bad, the word was &quot;frigid&quot;.  Just reporting a perception, not passing judgement.  I&#039;m sure folks have plenty of perceptions about me I&#039;d rather not hear as well.  ;)

Kissy boo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling someone you&#8217;ve never met &#8220;idiotic&#8221; demonstrates a lack of insight and intellect as well as a mean streak the universe doesn&#8217;t need. Karma.</p>
<p>That said, here&#8217;s an excerpt from the email:</p>
<p>~ so maigh, I noticed the suicide girls link on the atmetblog site, and was like &#8220;oh, what is this?&#8221;  not even thinking what it could be.  So I clicked on it, and got a nice pay site for meeting women that &#8220;dont have big hair or boob jobs&#8221;.  Now I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;m a prude at all. I love looking at good looking women, ie:<br />
my wife.  youre picture on your site. but I was kind of caught off guard by this link on the site?  They just kind of letting anyone put up advertisement?  like I said, doesn&#8217;t bother me, just curious, because it seems alot of times with the postings that people are a little more &#8220;frigid&#8221; on metblogs.  ~</p>
<p>My bad, the word was &#8220;frigid&#8221;.  Just reporting a perception, not passing judgement.  I&#8217;m sure folks have plenty of perceptions about me I&#8217;d rather not hear as well.  ;)</p>
<p>Kissy boo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CM</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4111</link>
		<dc:creator>CM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4111</guid>
		<description>This goes with the Thomas Frank&#039;s commodification of dissent theory. Of course we&#039;re now in a world where there are no longer any kinds of dissent that haven&#039;t been commodified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This goes with the Thomas Frank&#8217;s commodification of dissent theory. Of course we&#8217;re now in a world where there are no longer any kinds of dissent that haven&#8217;t been commodified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plumdrank</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4110</link>
		<dc:creator>plumdrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4110</guid>
		<description>the idea that atlanta or metblogs readers are too &quot;prudish&quot; for suicide girls is idiotic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the idea that atlanta or metblogs readers are too &#8220;prudish&#8221; for suicide girls is idiotic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/comment-page-1/#comment-4109</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlanta.metblogs.com/2006/03/07/we-have-arrived/#comment-4109</guid>
		<description>Maigh - someone thought we were too prudish here? Hmmm... I&#039;m not so sure I&#039;d agree. Maybe we need to do some more risque posts - Metblogs does Atlanta or something... Actually, I&#039;m not sure I can think of something that would legitimately make us seen less prudish...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maigh &#8211; someone thought we were too prudish here? Hmmm&#8230; I&#8217;m not so sure I&#8217;d agree. Maybe we need to do some more risque posts &#8211; Metblogs does Atlanta or something&#8230; Actually, I&#8217;m not sure I can think of something that would legitimately make us seen less prudish&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

